Saturday, 18 September 2010
More pics from Griffith's Gold Coast campus
Friday, 17 September 2010
Griffith University visit - 17/09/2010
I visited Griffith University today. I didn’t leave disappointed. First stop was Logan Campus to run a Technology, Feedback, Action! workshop. 17 or 18 people participated including academic, blending learning officers, curriculum consultants and students. It was well received, with comments like ‘it’s refreshing’, ‘it’s great that the students’ voice is heard’, and a sneak peak at the session evaluation forms looked favourable. I then spent some time talking with blended learning officers and curriculum consultants. Their support model includes centralised support within Griffith Institute for Higher Education and blended learning officers and curriculum consultants in each group (faculty) to provide just-in-time support. Despite being group-based, the blended learning officers report centrally via the Deans of Learning and Teaching and PVC for Learning and Teaching, and regularly to the Learning Environment Committee (I suppose the equivalent will be a group of FD staff) so that the blended learning officers are aware of broader university goals and the Learning Environment Committee understand what a blended learning officer do on a daily basis and the challenges they face, or hear from academic staff. I thought that was a useful channel of communication. They also have an equivalent of our Bb Ops Team meetings but they only take place every 6-8 weeks.
Griffith hold an annual 'Excellence in Teaching Week' in October/November during which a black-tie Teaching Citation Awards dinner is held. Part of this is a blended-learning symposium showcasing examples of Blackboard innovations from each of the groups (faculties). All sessions are professionally recorded (the three-camera stuff). (Stupot thinks - ideas for the next round of show'n'shares!).
I was then taken on a tour of the Logan Campus. It is a fairly new campus in Griffith’s portfolio and feels quite rural. It is a very small campus with little outside infrastructure (shops and services etc), and until only recently they had cows and calves in the fields nearby.
Following this I was taken for a 30 min car journey down the Pacific Highway and Gold Coast Highway to my next stop: the Gold Coast Campus. Griffith are investing heavily in this campus, including the building of a new teaching hospital. I was shown the library with its innovative learning spaces and fairly laid back feel – students sprawled on sofas and beanbags with laptops or watching DVDs, or completing group tasks together in pods. There is an immense feeling of space, light and colour, even on the first floor where books are housed. I was shown other parts of the campus, including the numerous learning spaces where there are dedicated desktop PC areas, lecture theatres where they appear designed with personal space and legroom in mind and aesthetically pleasing buildings. They are certainly making the use of their envious location of a university situated on the Gold Coast. It left me in awe.
Thursday, 16 September 2010
Brisbane
Wednesday, 15 September 2010
Quick reflection on BbSummit Australasia
Working together, learning together: an integrated approach to support
Bergita Shannon, Blackboard Service Manager and Natasha Giardina, Learning Designer, Queensland University of Technology
This session looked at how a central professional support team (including graphic design, programmers, TV, learning design and Blackboard support) can enhance academic staff use of technologies across a large university by working with and maximising the support provided at faculty-level. A large university has:
- A wide divergence in academic staff attitudes to technology
- Variety of technical and pedagogical competences of academic staff
- Limited support resources
- The challenge of achieving lasting, measurable and ongoing improvement
They argue universities need to:
- Foster dept support structure with emphasis on sharing and communication
- Leverage faculty leadership and support networks
- Implement faculty-based and university-wide showcases and professional development
- Use adopter profiles to your advantage (we undertook an interesting activity looking at the profile, support needs, strength and weaknesses of different types of staff):
Profile: | Support needs: | Key strength: | Key weakness: | |
Innovators | Coding-savvy rule-breakers | Hard to support! Often need advanced programming support | Stretch the limits of the possible | They can break Blackboard! |
Early adopters | Enthusiastic, results-focussed, willing to take calculated risks | People-orientated support relationships | Long-term development possible; can inspire others | Risk-taking needs faculty/school support |
Majority | Cautious, not very tech-savvy | Good resources and training; prompt support | Use technology in solid ways | Negative experiences with technology can create resistance |
Die-hard | Resistant to change and technology; motivated by fear and issues of power | Difficult to support due to resistance | Can highlight basic needs issues | Can foment negative attitudes; often difficult to work with |
QUT have a flexible learning initiatives project – showcasing best practice in faculties to promote uptake. And Learning Design Live – a 13-week programme of staff development via Elluminate. These are general sessions, some with a faculty focus. Staff can view sessions again or directed to these to remove and save time on loads of one to one sessions.
Some dynamic site interfaces were demonstrated. Including ‘Assessment at a Glance’ – a way of displaying course/module assessment information. I need to follow this up.
Talking about 20%...
I’m not really sure that I got anything from this session. Essentially Manuka Institute of Technology (16,000 students, 4,000 full-time equivalent; 800 teaching staff, 80% using Blackboard) have a top-down mandate that there must be 20% of blended delivery in every programme across the institute.
They use a ‘blended learning plan for a programme template’ and e-learning support staff work with academic teams asking where they are going to put the 20%, and specify the hours to be spent on task. The template is a bit like the typology, but nowhere near as good. Much content is developed using Wimba Create, and they said it’s quite popular with staff – I make no wonder all development is done centrally and not by individual academic staff. It may explain its popularity. They also use Wimba Classroom and voicetools, and a variety of other tools including Toolbox, Hot Potatoes, Quandary, and Who Wants To Be A Top Chef (apparently it’s available online but I couldn’t find it).
Staff professional development for e-learning at MIT include: Bb beginners, Bb advanced, Basic Wimba toolsets (sessions 1-3pm daily, and Tuesday nights), advanced Wimba toolsets, and 600 hours Graduate Certificate in Applied eLearning (Level 7) which anyone can undertake.
A university-wide approach to leveraging Blackboard Technology for Fundamental Improvements in Teaching and Learning
Charles Darwin University is the only university in Northern Territory, multi-campus, offer mobile learning labs in trucks, HE >7,000 students and VET >14,000. This presentation focussed on the journey the university took towards ‘fleximode’ delivery. A feature of NT is the lack of broadband infrastructure.
Martin Carroll, PVC Learning, Teaching & Community Engagement, claimed the approach to ‘fleximode’ focuses on engagement rather than delivery models. Students are able to engage with learning resources and assessment activities using the means that best suit them, therefore learning resources and assessment activities must be designed in multiple modes. It does not mean anything goes – it must be pedagogically driven and that’s where Bb comes in. He talked a bit about their approach to Blackboard uptake, and the staff development which was funded by a AUD$ 3m government grant, match-funded by CDU and extra funding by Blackboard. However uptake stagnated and in fact the number of courses supported dropped when they moved to Bb9 due to a number of problems, but apparently they are winning staff back during the user testing in advance to the move to 9.1 in November.
He then really went on to preach to the converted about the benefits of online provision and at-elbow support models. However, what was interesting is that they are using the Bb Outcomes system as a means for managing the entire internal unit and course accreditation workflow, in particular for the common standards and graduate attributes being rolled out across Australia. CDU are looking for benchmarking partners, esp. training and support processes and use of Outcomes to assess graduate attribute uptake.